Microaggressions at work: small moments, real patterns
The joke about your accent that's "just banter". Being called articulate in a tone of surprise. The meeting where your idea lands flat, and lands brilliantly ten minutes later from someone else. Being asked where you're really from. Any one of these, alone, is survivable and deniable — that's precisely what makes the pattern so exhausting. You can't point to a single incident big enough to report, and yet the accumulated weight is changing how you work.
What a microaggression actually is
Small, repeated slights — often unintentional, sometimes not — that track a part of who you are: race, sex, age, accent, disability, religion, sexuality, class, parenthood. The defining features are smallness (each incident is individually explainable), repetition (they keep happening), and direction (they cluster around a characteristic). One clumsy comment is a clumsy comment. The same "compliment" for the fourth time, from the same people, only ever aimed at people like you — that's data.
Honesty in both directions matters here too: people do put a foot wrong innocently, and a workplace where every awkward sentence becomes an incident helps nobody. The test isn't whether a comment could be innocent — most could. It's whether the pattern, seen whole, tells a consistent story about how you specifically are treated.
Why "it's small" doesn't mean "it doesn't matter"
Two reasons. The human one: drip erosion works. Each small moment costs a little confidence, a little belonging, a little energy spent wondering whether to react — and the total is real even when no single drop is. The legal one: in the UK and many countries, harassment law asks whether unwanted conduct related to a protected characteristic created a degrading, humiliating or offensive environment — and courts assess environments, which are built from accumulations. A pattern of "small" incidents can meet that bar when a single one wouldn't.
What actually works
- Log them — especially because they're small. Date, what was said, who was present, and the characteristic it touched. Individually forgettable moments become an unanswerable pattern on paper. Personal device, never work systems.
- Try the low-key naming, once, if it feels safe. "You've mentioned my accent a few times now — I'd rather we talked about the work." Calm, specific, no accusation of intent. Reasonable people adjust; the log records what happens next either way.
- Check the comparator. Do colleagues outside your characteristic get the same treatment? Its absence in their working life is part of your evidence.
- If it continues, treat it as what the pattern shows it is — conduct related to a protected characteristic, which most employers' dignity-at-work policies and most countries' equality laws take seriously. A calm, dated log turns "I can't quite explain it" into something an investigator can act on.
You don't have to work this out alone. In My Corner is a team of five AI companions for exactly this — one who listens, one who decodes letters and knows your deadlines, one who keeps your evidence organised, one for fresh starts, one who teaches. Private by design: conversations are never stored on our servers.
Talk it through — In My Corner
In My